Art Under Attack - 11 Famous Masterpieces Damaged By Madmen - DailyArtDaily.com
DailyArtDaily
AVAILABLE ON

Just Weird Vandalised 'Rokeby Venus', 1914

Published on September 22nd, 2017 | by Zuzanna Stanska

Art Under Attack – 11 Famous Masterpieces Damaged By Madmen

The term vandalisme was coined in 1794 by Henri Grégoire, bishop of Blois, to describe the destruction of artwork following the French Revolution.

But in this article I want to write about couple of madmen who intended to destroy pieces of art. Many vandals were diagnosed with a mental disorder and some, such as Hans-Joachim Bohlmann, had a history of attacking artworks. Just to mention the story of Bohlmann – between 1977 and 2006, he damaged over 50 paintings worth more than 270 million Deutsche Marks (about 138 million euro). Among his victims are Golden Fish by Paul Klee, Martin Luther and his wife Katharina von Bora by Lucas Cranach the Elder, Archduke Albrecht by Rubens, Rembrandt’s Jacob blessing Joseph’s second son, 1656, a self-portrait by Rembrandt and Willem Drost’s Noli me tangere. But his story needs another article.

Here you have it: 11 masterpieces damaged by madmen.

Mona Lisa

art vandalism Mona Lisa, Leonardo da Vinci, 1503, Louvre Museum

Mona Lisa, Leonardo da Vinci, 1503, Louvre Museum

Mona Lisa by Leonardo da Vinci has long been attracting vandals and is currently one of the best-protected artworks. In 1956, the lower part of the painting was severely damaged when a vandal doused the painting with acid while it was on display at a museum in Montauban, France. On 30 December of the same year, a young Bolivian named Ugo Ungaza Villegas threw a rock at the painting; this resulted in the loss of a speck of pigment near the left elbow, which was later painted over.

In April 1974, a handicapped woman, upset by the museum’s policy for the disabled, sprayed red paint at the painting while it was on display at the Tokyo National Museum. On 2 August 2009, a Russian woman, distraught over being denied French citizenship, threw a terracotta mug or teacup, purchased at the museum, at the painting in the Louvre; the vessel shattered against the glass enclosure. In both cases, the painting was undamaged. The use of bulletproof glass has shielded the Mona Lisa from more recent attacks.

Night Watch

art vandalism A restorer looks at the damage of the Nightwatch

A restorer looks at the damage of the Nightwatch

Rembrandt’s Night Watch was vandalized on several occasions. On 13 January 1911, an unemployed navy cook tried to cut it with a knife, but could not cut through the thick varnish on the painting. In 1975, William de Rijk, an unemployed school teacher, cut dozens of zigzag lines in the painting with a knife before he was wrestled by the guards. The day before, de Rijk had been turned away from the museum because he arrived after closing time. After the event, he was identified with a mental disorder; he was sent to a psychiatric hospital and committed suicide there on 21 April 1976. It took six months to restore the painting, and traces of the cuts still remain. In 1990, a man threw acid on the painting. The guards managed to quickly dilute it with water so that it penetrated only the varnish layer, and the painting was restored again.

Rokeby Venus

art vandalism Vandalised 'Rokeby Venus', 1914

Vandalised ‘Rokeby Venus’, 1914

On 10 March 1914, militant suffragette Mary Richardson walked into the National Gallery of London and attacked Diego Velázquez’s painting Rokeby Venus with a meat cleaver. Her action was ostensibly provoked by the arrest of fellow suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst the previous day, although there had been earlier warnings of a planned attack on the collection. Richardson left seven slashes on the painting, all of which have been successfully repaired. Richardson was sentenced to six months imprisonment, the maximum allowed for destruction of an artwork. In a statement to the Women’s Social and Political Union shortly afterwards, Richardson explained, “I have tried to destroy the picture of the most beautiful woman in mythological history as a protest against the Government for destroying Mrs. Pankhurst, who is the most beautiful character in modern history”. She added in a 1952 interview that she didn’t like “the way men visitors gaped at it all day long”.

Guernica

art vandalism Modern Art employees clean spray paint off of Picasso's “Guernica,” after Tony Shafrazi vandalized it with the words “Kill lies all,” in February 1974.

MoMA employees clean spray paint off of Picasso’s “Guernica,” after Tony Shafrazi vandalized it with the words “Kill lies all,” in February 1974.

In 1974, Tony Shafrazi (who is the owner of the Shafrazi Art Gallery in New York and deals artwork by artists such as Francis Bacon, Keith Haring, and David LaChapelle) wrote “KILL LIES ALL” with red spray paint over the work Guernica by Pablo Picasso. Shafrazi was ostensibly protesting Richard Nixon’s pardon of William Calley for the latter’s actions during the My Lai massacre. The paint was LUCKILY removed with relative ease from the varnished surface.

Danaë

art vandalism Danae after the acid attack

Danae after the acid attack

On 15 June 1985, Rembrandt’s 17th-century painting Danaë was attacked in the Hermitage Museum in Russia. A man, later judged insane, first threw sulfuric acid on the canvas and then cut it twice with a knife. The entire central part of the composition was virtually destroyed. The restoration took 12 years, between 1985 and 1997; since then, the painting has been protected with an armored glass.

The White Cross

art vandalism Alexander Brener on Malevich's White Cross

Alexander Brener’s green dollar sign on Malevich’s White Cross

In 1997, Alexander Brener, is a Russian-Jewish performance artist, and a self-described political activist painted a green dollar sign on Kazimir Malevich‘s painting The White Cross The painting was restored and Brener was sentenced to 5 months in prison. During the court case, he said in his defense:

The cross is a symbol of suffering, the dollar sign a symbol of trade and merchandise … What I did was not against the painting. I view my act as a dialogue with Malewitz.

I still don’t get, why people do such things?

Pieta

art vandalism Laszlo Toth, 33, attacking Michelangelo's Pieta in the Vatican's St. Peter's Basilica,

Laszlo Toth, 33, attacking Michelangelo’s Pieta in the Vatican’s St. Peter’s Basilica

A Hungarian-born Australian geologist, Laszlo Toth attacked Michelangelo’s 1499 marble masterwork depicting the Virgin Mary cradling the dead body of Christ with hammer, while shouting, “I am Jesus Christ, risen from the dead!” Toth struck the Piéta 15 times, breaking off Mary’s arm at the elbow as wells as part of her nose and eyelid.

art vandalism The Virgin Mary after the attack

The Virgin Mary after the attack

A group of bystanders, including an American who repeatedly punched him, tackled Toth almost immediately. The incident, which took place during the Pentecost on May 21, was triggered by Toth’s long-held fantasy that he was Jesus; he’d even written the Pope the prior year to demand that he be recognized as The Messiah. Judged insane, Toth was committed to a mental hospital in Italy for two years before deportation back to Australia. He never faced jail time for is actions.

The Virgin and Child with St Anne and St John the Baptist

art vandalism Leonardo_da_Vinci_-_Virgin_and_Child_with_Ss_Anne_and_John_the_Baptist

Leonardo da Vinci, Virgin and Child with St Anne and John the Baptist, c. 1499–1500 or c. 1506–8, National Gallery, London

While hanging in London’s National Gallery, this large charcoal drawing created around 1500 by Leonardo da Vinci became a gunshot victim when Robert Cambridge peppered the work with a shotgun he’d hidden under his coat. Though he fired from about seven feet away, the pellets themselves didn’t damage the work. Rather, it was shards from a section of protective laminated glass pulverized by the blast. The result tore a six-inch diameter hole into a part of the drawing containing the Virgin Mary’s robe. In 1988, The New York Times reported that the restoration involved “an elaborate process in which dozens of tiny fragments of paper were glued back together, one by one.” Cambridge, meanwhile, was confined to an institution for the criminally ill after telling police he’d been motivated by his disgust with the policies of then-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.

What Margaret Thatcher has to do with Leonardo da Vinci, remains unknown.

Black On Maroon

 art vandalismVandalised Rothko

Vandalised Rothko

Rothko’s 1958 abstraction was defaced as it hung in London’s Tate Gallery by one Wlodzimierz Umaniec, an artist, blogger and sole proponent of an artistic philosophy he dubbed Yellowism. Using a black marker, he wrote “A POTENTIAL PIECE OF YELLOWISM” in the painting’s lower right-hand corner, adding the pseudonymous signature, Vladimir Umanets. Umaniec spent the next year in prison and after his release, professed his regret in an editorial written for The Guardian newspaper.

Monet

art vandalism Claude Monet in his studio

Claude Monet in his studio

A rather unusual case, which might not qualify as vandalism, occurred in 1908. An exhibition was set up for May of that year with paintings by Claude Monet, which had already been praised by critics and were estimated at $100,000 (1908 prices). Despite this, Monet decided that he was not satisfied with his work and in a sudden move destroyed all the paintings with a knife and a paint brush. Ethics discussions broke out: Should an artist have the right to destroy his own work? At least one expert thought so and praised him for being a true artist rather than a manufacturer, telling the New York Times, “It is a pity, perhaps, that some other painters do not do the same.”

Podkowiński

art vandalism Władysław Podkowinski, The Frenzy of Exultations, 1895, The National Museum in Krakow

Władysław Podkowinski, The Frenzy of Exultations, 1894, The National Museum in Krakow

Another weird story: this famous painting, well known in Poland showing crazed naked woman riding a wild horse caused a big controversy and a scandal in Warsaw art salons in its time (1894). The exhibition lasted only 36 days because Podkowinski brought a knife on the 37th day and tried to destroy his work, especially damaging the figure of the woman. The cause of his behavior had not been completely clarified. When Podkowinski painted it he was already in the last stages of tuberculosis, he died one year later in the age of 29.

Find out more:

  


About the Author

Art Historian, huge fan of Giorgione or Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres. Founder and CEO of DailyArtDaily.com and DailyArt mobile app. But to be honest, her greatest accomplishment is being the owner of Pimpek the Cat.



Back to Top ↑

Subscribe to our newsletter!