Published on July 6th, 2016 | by Zuzanna Stanska
Why Renoir Should Be Reconsidered As An Art Master?
Pierre-Auguste Renoir is considered to be one of the masters of the impressionist style. We all love impressionists and usually when we think of their works we see images like this:
You know, calm, colorful and vibrating paintings of water, fields, cities. Subjects that are painted in a broad, rapid style, with the easily recognizable brushstrokes and bright colors. The term ‘impressionism’ comes from a painting by Claude Monet called Impression, soleil levant (“Impression, Sunrise”), which he exhibited at the Parisian Salon. An art critic saw the exhibition and wrote a review in which he said that all the paintings were just “impressions”.
We don’t expect to see a subliminal advertising of Michelin tires instead:
or a piece of human flesh put on a salad of seaweed:
or a woman with a lizard face, thigh-size neck and a hat in a form of a flying saucer:
or a boy with the hands bigger than his head. Did they swell because he’d played Angry Birds on his iPhone for too long? What about his enormous arms? Were they stung by a swarm of bees?
This woman is supposed to wear a blue blouse – I bet she owned one but it seems she must have left it in the closet on the day Renoir painted her. Renoir was sometimes really horrible with human faces and body proportions. His people usually look like sacks of potatoes glued with tiny heads.
In the United States there is a movement that requests the removal of all of the literally awful Renoir paintings hanging in the National Gallery in Washington DC. In 2015 they have protested in front of couple of US Museums. Now you know why!